Ensuring Plausibility Under Daubert—Anything’s Possible

Posted date: September 28, 2016 In: QuickPress

“Dr. Expert, here is our theory for the case. Can you tell me if it’s possible?” Anyone see anything wrong with this? Can the lawyer be the one to come up with the theory for the case? Should lawyers run their theory by their experts? Annie Dike explains that whether or not their theory will pass muster under Daubert will depend not on its possibility but, rather, its plausibility.

To read the full article in The National Law Review, click: Ensuring Plausibility Under Daubert—Anything’s Possible.

‹ Previous Next ›

National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts

The National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts (NACVA) supports the users of business and intangible asset valuation services and financial forensic services, including damages determinations of all kinds and fraud detection and prevention, by training and certifying financial professionals in these disciplines.

Number of Entries : 2543