The Death of Testimonial Overstatement The proper interpretation for the standard of admissibility under the amended Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence will hopefully result in an evidentiary change that flies in the face of every hired gun’s essence, as the real impact of the trial court truly being a gatekeeper is that it will shield the jury from the testimonial overstatement salaciously proffered by expert witnesses. This 16th article of the unimpeachable neutrality series will take a deeper dive into the potential implications surrounding the up-and-coming amendment to Rule 702 and common risks that this amendment may…
-
-
An Unimpeachable Cure for Delusive Exactness This 15th article of the unimpeachable neutrality series discusses the pathology, symptoms, and treatment for a bad case of delusive exactness. Delusive exactness affects thousands of financial experts every day and can be fatal to a case if left untreated. On balance, delusive exactness, as described herein, refers to the testimonial delirium exhibited by a financial expert witness that overstates the strength of their conclusion of damages or value beyond that which can or should reasonably be drawn from the application of the methods, data, or sources of information relied upon, considered, or applied…