• QuickPress

    Wells Fargo Ends Fight with a Whistleblower in Fake-Accounts Scandal

    Wells Fargo has put an end to a well-publicized fight with a former retail bank manager who blew the whistle on its sham-accounts scheme that ultimately affected 3.5 million Americans.  Both sides say they reached a settlement this month, though its terms are confidential.  The agreement signals a possible shift in legal strategy for Wells as it appears to be the first instance in which the bank has voluntarily ended one of its lengthy fights with any of the whistleblowers it fired after they spoke up about the creation of fake accounts. To read the full article in FinancialPlanning, click:…

  • QuickPress

    How to Comply with the New AICPA Ethics Standards for M&A

    The rise in firm discontinuances and sales brings with it a host of practitioner concerns regarding independence, confidentiality, and the transfer of client files.  To address these concerns and provide specific guidance, the Professional Ethics Executive Committee issued two new interpretations of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct (the Code) and revised an existing interpretation.  April Sherman, manager at AICPA Professional Ethics Division, explains. To read the full article in the Journal of Accountancy, click: How to Comply with the New AICPA Ethics Standards for M&A.

  • QuickPress

    Why Good Employees do Bad Things

    For outsiders observing a scandal at a company or organization, the situation often seems implausible or incomprehensible.  How did leaders let it happen?  Why did so many people go along with the wrongdoing?  And for so long?  The bigger the fallout, the more we shake our heads in disbelief.  Kellogg’s Maryam Kouchaki on understanding—and avoiding—ethical breakdowns. To read the full article in strategy+business, click: Why Good Employees do Bad Things.

  • Litigation Consulting - QuickRead Top Story

    Providing Effective Litigation Services (Part 3 of 4)

    An overview of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and leading pre- and post-Daubert cases In this third part of a four-part series, the focus turns to the rules of evidence and standards used to admit the testimony of expert witnesses. While a minority of jurisdictions follows the Frye standard, the majority has adopted the Daubert standard. Objective testimony is critical, which means the expert must not merely accept representations from the client.

  • Financial Forensics - QuickPress

    Psychology Of Fraud: Why Good People Do Bad Things

    Psychology Of Fraud: Why Good People Do Bad Things NPR’s Chana Joffe-Walt and Alix Spiegel have put together a fascinating podcast that examines the psychology of fraud. It often isn’t as easily explained as bad people doing bad things. Ethicists and psychologists have documented an unusually high number of people who start out, in their minds, doing the right thing. The story follows the case of Toby Groves. He was a man who almost everyone who knew admired for his integrity. In fact, his company’s culture was defined, according to many former employees, by its high integrity. But It began…