• QuickRead Top Story - Valuation/Appraisal

    Terminal Value

    The Problem with Exit Multiples Most of an Income Approach-based valuation is frequently in the terminal value. Thus, an Income Approach-based valuation that relies on an exit multiple to arrive at a terminal value is essentially a Market Approach-based valuation in disguise. Many practitioners do not use an exit multiple to arrive at a terminal value for this reason. Nevertheless, numerous practitioners prefer to use an exit multiple. The basis is straight-forward: the goal is to arrive at a value of the business at the end of the discrete projection period and a hypothetical sale at that time is likely…

  • Litigation Consulting - QuickRead Top Story - Valuation/Appraisal

    What to Consider When Divorcing Parties Have

    Ownership Interests in Privately Held Companies This article focuses on concepts and issues that are important for family law attorneys to understand when navigating cases that involve divorcing clients with ownership interests in privately-held entities. One of the first questions that arises is whether we need to retain a valuation expert? This is an important question, where experts can provide attorneys and the parties important guidance and address expectations, preferably early in this emotional process. [su_pullquote align=”right”]Resources: Corporate Divorce Litigation—Understanding its Dynamics and Formulating Solutions Resolving Family Law Disputes The Power of Neutrality in Resolving Family Law Disputes Valuation Issues…

  • Case Law

    Palmerino v. Palmerino & Giaimo v. Vitale

    In Palmerino v. Palmerino, the Massachusetts Court of Appealsconsidered whether a trial court erred in valuing the husband’s grocery store. The trial court’s approach had not included discounts—and went further to state that the income approach is preferable for valuation.  Find out what the court decides!  In Giaimo v. Vitale, the Supreme Court of New York considers the dissolution of a company called EGA Associates. The case involved the sale of 19 residential buildings in Manhattan, accusations of fraud during discovery hearings on fair value, and the applicability of proposed discounts for marketability and built-in capital gains.