Excel and Position Yourself as the Expert There is an important difference between a service provider and an expert. In this article, Rod Burkert discusses why the differentiation is important and how to position yourself to be an expert. When it comes to the work you do, are you a service provider or an expert? Have you thought about the differences? Do you realize there are differences? Our BVFLS industry/profession/world is changing: The number of appraisers (choices) is increasing The valuation mechanics are more intricate The businesses we value are more complex The audience of leads, prospects, clients, and referral…
-
-
Tips to Successfully Transition to the Expert Level There are several steps to making the transition from generalist to specialist. For those who have gone through this process, the primary regret is often that they did not make the transition earlier. To help anyone sitting on the fence, I am sharing some brief tips from my own experience. There are several benefits to being highly specialized. One of them is the reduction in the number of competitors. This tends to result in higher billing rates and less time needed for business development. Generalists tend to devote significant time to looking…
-
Book Review This fall, the American Bar Association released Shannon Pratt’s The Lawyer’s Business Valuation Handbook 3rd Edition. This publication has been edited by Roger J. Grabowski, FASA and Alina Niculita, ASA, ARM-BV, CFA, MBA. It is a comprehensive guide for attorneys (and judges) to enable them to better understand the substance and basis of the valuation expert’s work. In this article, Michael G. Kaplan reviews the book. I Had a Problem! I received a phone call from an attorney. He was representing a client involved in a hotly contested lawsuit involving the impairment of the value of a business.…
-
The Tax Court Says Certified A recent Tax Court opinion brought to light the importance of having an appraiser designation from a professional appraiser organization. While the decision is limited to Tax Court cases, it provides a cautionary tale for all who provide business appraisals in litigious situations. A recent Tax Court opinion brought to light the importance of having an appraiser designation from a professional appraiser organization.[1] While the decision is limited to Tax Court cases, it provides a cautionary tale for all who provide business appraisals in litigious situations. The case involved a charitable contribution of shares in…
-
The Death of Testimonial Overstatement The proper interpretation for the standard of admissibility under the amended Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence will hopefully result in an evidentiary change that flies in the face of every hired gun’s essence, as the real impact of the trial court truly being a gatekeeper is that it will shield the jury from the testimonial overstatement salaciously proffered by expert witnesses. This 16th article of the unimpeachable neutrality series will take a deeper dive into the potential implications surrounding the up-and-coming amendment to Rule 702 and common risks that this amendment may…
-
Rosenthal v. Erber illustrates the pressure and perils of dueling experts. The expert is charged with assisting the court ascertain the facts, rather than furthering the client’s ambition. The case is a reminder to business valuation professionals that ethical considerations are paramount and that doing the contrary leads to courts’ suspecting the role of experts in the process. In the main, valuation experts pride themselves on reasoned analysis and well supported use of professional judgement. As a profession, valuators are confident that most reports uphold the demanding standards of the profession. Judges, on the other hand, do not always view…
-
The Role of a Neutral Third-Party Valuation Expert as an Umpire in Partnership Deadlocks Partnerships are common structures in professional service practices, offering opportunities for synergistic collaboration. However, conflicts can arise, especially in the absence of a well-contemplated equitable profit-sharing formula and a deadlock-breaking mechanism in the partnership contract. This article explores the fair resolution of partnership disputes arising from equitable profit-sharing in a 50/50 partnership with unequal workloads, and without a deadlock-breaking mechanism. Introduction Partnerships are common structures in professional service practices, offering opportunities for synergistic collaboration. However, conflicts can arise, especially in the absence of a well-contemplated equitable…
-
An Unimpeachable Cure for Delusive Exactness This 15th article of the unimpeachable neutrality series discusses the pathology, symptoms, and treatment for a bad case of delusive exactness. Delusive exactness affects thousands of financial experts every day and can be fatal to a case if left untreated. On balance, delusive exactness, as described herein, refers to the testimonial delirium exhibited by a financial expert witness that overstates the strength of their conclusion of damages or value beyond that which can or should reasonably be drawn from the application of the methods, data, or sources of information relied upon, considered, or applied…
-
At a Deposition or Court Hearing To begin to understand the subject, we must point out that the “Reglas de Evidencia de Puerto Rico” (the Puerto Rico Rules of Evidence) and the Federal Rules of Evidence adopted in the district of Puerto Rico—which is part of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals—allow for expert testimony to be inserted into the “record” of a case in a deposition or in a court hearing, are basically the same. This article covers the significance of the Daubert standard and provides a summary of rules to temper the expert that does not feel constrained…
-
End of Life or Another Day at the Office? One of the most concerning communications for experts to receive from a hiring attorney is the opposing attorney has filed a Daubert motion to exclude their opinion. Going through a Daubert challenge is stressful for even experienced experts. This article will discuss the Daubert decision and its impact on experts. It will also address questions considered by courts regarding an expert and their work. Finally, the author will discuss his experience with Daubert challenges, the process, and working with the hiring attorney in defending the expert’s opinions. One of the most…
-
Changes in the Methods of Dispute Resolution In this article, Steven I. Platt, a retired Maryland Circuit Court judge, founder of The Platt Group, Inc., and QuickRead’s newest editorial board member, shares with readers the changes he sees affecting civil court proceedings, rise of alternative dispute resolutions, and opportunities that are becoming available to credentialed business valuation and financial forensic professionals. Traditionally, our citizens have had their disputes (legal and factual) resolved by a judge or jury in a courtroom. There, the role of the “Expert” has historically focused on assisting the trier of fact, be it a judge or…
-
To Create a Visual Picture Every profession has its own unique vocabulary, and although everyone in the field understands the terms or abbreviations, the public most likely does not. An easy way to help people understand technical terms or a profession’s distinctive vocabulary is to create a “word picture” that links that unique word to some everyday idea or object. The author suggests that metaphors and similes are keys to enabling the client to make these connections. Every profession has its own unique vocabulary, and although everyone in the field understands the terms or abbreviations, the public most likely does…
-
Apropos Restrictions of Data, Time, and Financial Resources When uncertainty rises to a level—where facts appear to be indistinguishable from fiction—business valuation, forensic accounting, and litigation support must prioritize the virtues of unimpeachable neutrality, integrity, and objectivity. These three virtues provide a means of best assisting the trier of fact in distinguishing that which is misleading from that which is centered upon the facts, data, and evidence regarding material matters, questions, or issues of fact or law. In a world where people consume and embrace fake news and alternative facts and deem those “truths”, the once highly valued authority of…
-
Lost Profits and Loss of Business Value—Differences and Correlation in Terms of the Harmful Impact to Plaintiff’s Claims When a plaintiff suffers, or believes to have suffered, economic damages as a result of a defendant’s actions in a civil matter he/she and their attorney are faced with determining the amount of economic damage suffered. A damages remedy is provided to restore the plaintiff to the same economic position they were in prior to the act. The selection of the appropriate economic damage is a factual one based on various elements including causation and timing. While this may appear relatively straightforward,…
-
An Appraiser in Court This is a review of Henry J. Wise’s, MAI, CBA, BVAL, CRE (Retired) recently released book, It’s Only an Opinion: An Appraiser in Court. In this book, comprised of 23 chapters, Mr. Wise is not only humorous but also insightful. He shares several nuggets from his 35-years of experience testifying in court on real estate controversies. He offers valuable information to business appraisers, real estate attorneys, and real property appraisers. This is a review of Henry J. Wise’s, MAI, CBA, BVAL, CRE (Retired), recently released book, It’s Only an Opinion: An Appraiser in Court. In this…
-
The Role of the Expert in 21st Century Dispute Resolution—A Recovering Judge’s Perspective As technology evolves, the role of the expert and the interplay between experts and the judiciary will evolve. This change is already underway. In this article, QuickRead presents the presentation made by Retired Judge Platt at the NACVA and the CTI’s Annual Consultants’ Conference, held in Salt Lake City. Judge Platt describes this evolving landscape and employment opportunities. Introduction I appreciate this opportunity to discuss the role of the “expert” in the 21st Century profession of dispute resolution from the perspective of what I now call myself,…
-
Case Study of a Real Estate Developer For most lost profits cases, the losses begin at the date of the harmful act and end when the injured party is returned to the position it would have had “but for” the alleged damaging act of the defendant. However, not every lost profit matter is a breach of contract where beginning and ending dates can be easily defined. Sometimes losses may not occur until a period in the future. This situation requires the expert to assess the facts of the case and anticipate the market and economic environment when calculating these future…
-
Principles, Methods, and Applications Everett P. Harry, III and Jeffrey H. Kinrich assembled 45 authors, chosen for their expertise in lost profits damages, and contributed and co-edited this comprehensive lost profits damages “how to” book. The authors pay tribute to Robert L. Dunn, among others, for his vision in identifying the need for this book. The book marks an attempt by the authors to provide a single-source reference for practitioners who are tasked with selecting an appropriate methodology for determining lost profits, carrying out the analysis, and potentially defending their work during proceedings. In this book review, we provide an…
-
Insights for Your Practice Four cases are presented in this article that provide valuation, litigation support professionals, and M&A advisors insight regarding how courts are addressing damages claims, challenges to experts, appraisal action challenges, and claims of fraud and breach of contract in connection with M&A transactions. Although the cases are from Delaware and California, they provide insight for readers to use in their practices.
-
The Case of the Delayed Real Estate Development In a situation where there is a claim of wrongdoing and one party suffers pecuniary damages, it is incumbent on the economic damages expert to precisely define the period of such claimed damages to properly quantify them. The outcome is largely dependent on the expert’s processes for determining damages, the components of the Expert Report, and the ability to remain unbiased and issue opinions independent of the client’s interests.