• Litigation Consulting - QuickRead Top Story

    Don’t Get Struck

    February 4, 2026

    Why Financial Experts Get Excluded and How to Avoid It In this article, the authors describe at a high level the rules governing admissibility of expert testimony, discuss common pitfalls, and provide some tips for avoiding these pitfalls so that expert opinions can be admitted into evidence with maximum effect. Financial experts play a vital role in financial restructurings, delivering important insights in many contexts, including plan confirmation, analysis of sales of a debtor’s property, preferential and fraudulent transfer litigation, and many other areas. They also can be pivotal in commercial disputes and transactions, opining on business and asset valuation,…

  • Litigation Consulting - QuickRead Top Story

    Price Isn’t Right

    May 7, 2025

    Inside the Expert Battle Over Kroger’s Pharmacy Discounts What does “usual and customary price” mean? How does a plaintiff challenge such a broad assertion in a class action? What will a defendant assert to discredit a plaintiff’s expert? This article discusses the Daubert motion brought forth in Kirkbride v. The Kroger Co. and provides notice to how a challenge may unfold in other class action suits that have a similar underlying claim(s). In a closely watched ruling, a federal court allowed expert testimony to proceed against Kroger over claims it concealed lower prescription prices. At the center of it is…

  • Expert Witness - Litigation Consulting - QuickRead Top Story

    Accounting Expert Witness Reliably Calculates the Quantum of Monetary Harm

    January 29, 2025

    The Court Assess Substantive and Procedural Advanced to Disqualify Expert Witness This article provides an in-depth review of a recent infringement, unfair competition and cybersquatting where Plaintiff sought disgorgement of profits. The case highlights procedural and substantive arguments advanced during litigation and basis the Court used to partly disqualify the testimony of defendant’s expert witness. It also serves as a caution and learning opportunity for current and prospective financial damages expert witnesses. Plaintiff, Mission1st Group, Inc. (“M1G”), owns the federally registered trademark MISSION1st in connection with business advisory, information, technology, telecommunications, engineering support, and risk mitigation services. Plaintiff provides these…

  • Litigation Consulting - QuickRead Top Story - Valuation/Appraisal

    Amended Rule 702’s Unimpeachably Neutral Impact

    January 31, 2024

    The Death of Testimonial Overstatement The proper interpretation for the standard of admissibility under the amended Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence will hopefully result in an evidentiary change that flies in the face of every hired gun’s essence, as the real impact of the trial court truly being a gatekeeper is that it will shield the jury from the testimonial overstatement salaciously proffered by expert witnesses. This 16th article of the unimpeachable neutrality series will take a deeper dive into the potential implications surrounding the up-and-coming amendment to Rule 702 and common risks that this amendment may…

  • Expert Witness - QuickRead Featured

    Methodology

    July 13, 2016

    Will Your Methodology be up to Snuff? Beyond Frye and Daubert (Part IV of VII) The methodology employed by the expert is a critical factor determining the admissibility of the testimony. Frye, Daubert, and Kumho provide guidance regarding the admissibility of the testimony. In this article, the author discusses these and recent cases, including: Manpower, Inc. v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania; United States v. Alabama Power Company; United States v. Cinergy Corp., to illustrate the how courts have decided motions to exclude.

  • Litigation Consulting - QuickRead Top Story

    Providing Effective Litigation Services (Part 3 of 4)

    August 1, 2013

    An overview of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and leading pre- and post-Daubert cases In this third part of a four-part series, the focus turns to the rules of evidence and standards used to admit the testimony of expert witnesses. While a minority of jurisdictions follows the Frye standard, the majority has adopted the Daubert standard. Objective testimony is critical, which means the expert must not merely accept representations from the client.