• Case Law - QuickRead Featured

    Delaware LLC Operating Agreement Sets Forth the Ownership Interest

    Failure to make capital contributions did not void the operating agreement or reduce the ownership interest of non-complying partners In Grove v Brown, the Delaware Court of Chancery, relying on the unambiguous terms of a limited liability company (LLC) operating agreement, found that a member’s failure to make an initial capital contribution to a LLC did not affect that member’s ownership interest.   Further, the Court of Chancery, applying default fiduciary duties to the managing members found that two managing members breached their fiduciary duty of loyalty under the corporate opportunity doctrine.

  • Case Law - QuickRead Top Story

    Federal Cases: ESOP Fidiciuary Responsibility, Valuation Misstatement Penalties, More

    Plus: Bishop v. Commissioner Rules on When and Whether a Bad Debt Loss Can Be a Claimed Deduction In Schwab v. Commissioner, a case turns on when a variable universal life insurance policy is a taxable event.  In Boone Operations Co., LLC v. Commissioner, find out when contributing fill dirt to the city of Tucson is or isn’t a charitable or taxable event.

  • Case Law - QuickRead Featured

    State Case Law: Iowa Focuses on Equalization Payments, Louisiana Considers Future Cash Flow

    Recent Cases Consider: Fair Market Value in Arkansas, Equalization Payments and Healthcare Credits in Iowa, and Valuations Based on Future Cash Flow in Louisiana Judge Wiggins in Iowa rules In re Marriage of McDermott on equalization payments and tax credits for health insurance payments.  In Louisiana, Judge Williams finds a valuation in Fancher v. Prudhomme invalid since it was based on assumed cash flow—and a withdrawing member was the source of almost all the company’s business.  Instead, current asset value is key.  Find out more. 

  • Case Law - QuickRead Featured

    Tax Court Considers Renovation Value of $10M Home; Bankruptcy Court and Expert Testimony

    A Petitioner Relies Reasonably on His CPA in Gaggero v. Commissioner, the Tax Court Finds. That Makes a Difference: Here’s Why. In Gaggero v. Commissioner, Judge Holmes at the U.S. Tax Court disagrees with the IRS’s contention that the plaintiff conducted an improper scheme to avoid capital gains.  In First Street Holdings NV, LLC v. MS Mission Holdings, LLC, Judge Markell at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court finds a lower bankruptcy court’s errors to be likely prejudicial.