Part II of II This is the second of a two-part article (read Part I) related to the proposed (mostly) GAAP-based income tax in the (perhaps fatally wounded) Build Back Better Act. While the Build Back Better Act may be dead, the GAAP-based income tax is a polarizing concept that may be resurrected soon. The first part focused on why there is a push by some—and pushback by others—on such a tax. The second part imagines some changes that may occur in a world where big companies pay taxes based (mostly) on GAAP income. Here, the author envisions many items…
-
-
Part I of II This is the first of a two-part article related to the proposed (mostly) GAAP-based income tax in the (perhaps fatally wounded) Build Back Better Act. While the Build Back Better Act may be dead, the GAAP-based income tax is a polarizing concept that may be resurrected soon. The first part focuses on why there is a push by some—and pushback by others—on such a tax. The second part imagines some changes that may occur in a world where big companies pay taxes based (mostly) on GAAP income. This is the first of a two-part article related…
-
Investopedia weighs in on the pros and cons of varying approaches: Business valuation is never straightforward – for any company. For startups with little or no revenue or profits and less-than-certain futures, the job of assigning a valuation is particularly tricky. For mature, publicly listed businesses with steady revenues and earnings, normally it’s a matter of valuing them as a multiple of their earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), or based on other industry specific multiples. But it’s a lot harder to value a new venture that’s not publicly-listed and may be years away from sales. TUTORIAL: Valuing Employee Stock Options…