Owner Personality Strongly Affects Business Value. Learn How.
Owner Personality Strongly Affects Business Value. Learn How.
As consultants work with business owners to plan successful exit options, itâ€™s helpful to spend some time thinking about how the business was built. Paul Brown here describes how different owner personality typesâ€”described here as â€śMountain Lions,â€ť â€śWolf Packs,â€ť â€śBeavers,â€ť or â€śAntsâ€ťâ€”tend to build quite different sorts of businesses. Different approaches to taking risk, building management strength, and investing in long-term business structure can radically affect final business value. Hereâ€™s how.
It is a news headline all too familiar. Investors defrauded out of millions by a wealthy financier. Accounting fraud committed at a multi-billion dollar corporation by management. Employee embezzled hundreds of thousands from his company. While the magnitude of fraud involved in the cases that make headlines does not occur at all organizations, all organizations are at risk for fraud.
For several years weâ€™ve worked closely with owners as they put together their business transition plans. During this time weâ€™ve observed some interestingâ€”and consistentâ€”trends, most of which have been substantiated by a survey performed by Harris Interactive.
Many owners are not ready to â€śslow down.â€ť In fact, we know several who obtained an equity position in a new business venture after they sold their company. These â€śserial entrepreneursâ€ť are staying active and, for them, the challenge of building a new enterprise is more appealing than the challenge of lowering their handicap.
The Harris survey supports this by noting:
- 38 percent view their transition as the start of a â€śnew chapterâ€ť in their life
- 40 percent expect to continue their life as in the past
- Fewer than 25percent agree with the idea of relaxing and doing nothing
After selling their business, most owners want to continue working in some capacity, even when they donâ€™t need the money. Weâ€™ve noticed many owners are similar to lifelong athletes. Both have found that competing against others and against themselves, completing difficult challenges, and accomplishing important milestones are deeply satisfying. By continuing to contribute, owners get to â€śstay in the game.â€ť
The Harris survey found:
- 95 percent expect to work in some capacity in their retirementâ€”and for most, money will not be the primary reason for doing so
- 50 percent plan on working whether or not they get paid
Those who have prepared for the financial realities of retirement are more satisfied than those who have not. For owners and partners, financial planning includes a realistic assessment of the â€śstreet level estimateâ€ť of the value of the business, as well as an objective determination of its salability. This should be one of the first steps completed in the planning process since for most (up to 70 percent of all owners) the business or practice represents more than one-half of the ownerâ€™s personal wealth.
On this Harris made two important observations:
- More than 60 percent of those who said they had more than adequate resources to support themselves in retirement were extremely satisfied with their post-business life
- However, only 46 percent of those who had to â€ścut cornersâ€ť after they sold their business indicated they were satisfied
Most owners are not receiving enough from the sale of their business or practice to fund their post-transition lives. In fact, weâ€™ve found that without adequate preparation, a significant amount of the potential value of the business is lost.
After interviewing more than 300 business and practice owners who sold their companies, another study found that:
- 75 percent felt the sale did not accomplish their personal or financial objectives
Clearly, it is important for owners to understand the issues impacting the value and salability of a business. This understanding starts with the owner, and how he or she is building and running their company.
Owners typically build a business or practice from strongly held preferences on two key dimensions. It is important to understand these preferencesâ€”particularly when selling to a third partyâ€”since they impact business value.
The Dimension of Team.
The first dimension addresses the ownerâ€™s ability to build a business or practice with others. Consisting of an effective team or teams, business success is usually described in terms of what â€śweâ€ť did. As a result of the teamâ€™s clearly defined responsibilities, shared accountabilities, and fair distribution of rewards, the value of the company increases since prospective buyers are usually willing to pay more for this type of business; particularly if the teams come with it.
Other owners, for whatever reason, have not been able to embrace this â€śteamâ€ť concept when building a business or practice. Instead, they operate independently of others and, as a result, are naturally viewed as the cause of business success. Prospective buyers are reluctant to buy the company; particularly when the owner is unwilling to stay after the sale.
The Dimension of Time.
The second dimension addresses the timeframe owners take when growing their business wealth. Some have a strong desire to create and implement future oriented strategies requiring continued investment in the business or practice. They are willing to defer (to some extent) immediate rewards in order to improve operations, pursue new markets, and enhance the long-term value of the business.
As you can guess, others are reluctant to do so, even when the investment in the business or practice is actually an investment in their own future. These owners prefer to take their â€świnningsâ€ť today, believingâ€”or at least hopingâ€”that tomorrow will take care of itself.
By combining these two dimensions (Team and Time) we can identify four preferences owners have when starting and building their company. David Maister, when writing about professional compensation strategies, related these to four different animals.
- Type One: Mountain Lion
The first type is the owner who values independence, chooses to make minimal investments for the future, and is willing to bet on his or her ability to catch fresh meat each and every day. The solo operator (or sole practitioner) is primarily interested in receiving the immediate rewards for todayâ€™s results.
- Type Two: Wolf Pack
The second type prefers to act in coordination with others, but doesnâ€™t like to invest (or defer gratification) too much. He or she believes the business will do better when everyone works together; however, after a good year, most of the profits will usually be distributed as salaries and bonuses.
Both Type 1 and Type 2 owners are reluctant to invest or â€śbetâ€ť on the future. There may be a number of reasons for this, including their aversion to risk.
- Type Three: Beavers
A number of owners want to be independent, but are also interested in building for the future. They do so by investing time and resources to grow the business and its capabilities. Similar to â€śbeaversâ€ť who build dams to provide for their own family, these owners tend to diversify their holdings so as to lessen the influence of business value on their total personal worth.
- Type Four: Ants (or Bees)
Â The last type describes owners who want to be part of something bigger than what they can accomplish on their own, and, through patience and discipline, invest in the well-being of the entire organizationâ€”not just their personal goals. In many respects, these owners are fulfilled when their work benefits the entire community.
Grading the Impact on Value
Left unchecked, owners will usually build a business or practice that corresponds to his or her preferred type, whether Wolf Pack, Mountain Lion, Beaver or Ant. Although profitable companies can be led by any type of owner, some approaches contribute more to business value than others. Consequently, in order to complete their business transition plan, owners should give themselves time to review andâ€”if necessaryâ€”adopt a more promising model.
Ants: Grade A. It is easy to see how Ants (Type 4 owners) naturally build businesses that are graded high in terms of its overall value and salability. Over the years, the owners regularly invest in the growth and strength of the business while building the necessary teams to run it. Prospective buyers quickly learn that the companyâ€™s management team is largely responsible for its success, and that its equipment and processes are up to date. Together, this reduces the risk for the buyer who may then pay a higher price for the business.
This happened to a business led by one of our senior advisors. After the owner of a manufacturing company in the Pacific Northwest died, the family hired the senior advisor away from the bank to serve as its CEO. Under his leadership, the business and its culture transitioned from Type 1 (Mountain Lion) to Type 4 (Ant Farm). He aggressively reinvested profits back into the company, incorporated lean manufacturing throughout its operations, and improved the overall balance sheet. Eight years later, the company was soldâ€”at a premiumâ€”to a national corporation.
Wolf Pack: Grade B. Owners who build effective â€ścompaniesâ€ť can expect to sell their business or practice for more than those who build a high paying job. When reviewing a business or practice, prospective buyers consider its income and profits while trying to determine whether or not they will grow after the sale. Buyers are willing to pay more for a business when its success is built upon the key managers and employees who agree to stay with the company, and not just the owner who is leaving.
With a strong team in place, Type 2 owners might still find a willing buyer, even when the odds of doing so are considered low. Contractors, for example, usually have a hard time selling their companies to third-party buyers. We are working with one, however, that will undoubtedly become an exception. Over time, the owner has built and retained one of the most effective teams in the industry. Every year they find a way to do more business, increase income, and improve profits. They continue to do larger and more challenging projects and, as a result, have become the largest company of its kind in the four states that it does business. Although the owner provides the strategic direction and leadership for the company, he recognizes and cites the contributions others make to its overall success.
Beavers: Grade C. Both Beavers (Type 3) and Mountain Lions (Type 1) will have a hard time capturing business wealth when selling their company or practice. Because the owner holds most, if not all, of the key positions in the company and is responsible for most, if not all, of its key relationships, buyers may be unwilling to invest in the business since it appears to carry a high degree of risk. In a capital intensive industry, such as manufacturing, Type 3 owners may find more interest from those wanting to buy their equipment (since it may be up to date) than their business.
Given enough time Type 3 owners do have some options. First, they can build (or hire) an effective management team and transition critical responsibilities to them. This usually involves a revised salary and bonus structure, as well as some type of deferred compensation and/or incentive plan to retain key managers until the sale is closed. Before choosing this option, independents (Type 3 and Type 1 owners) need to consider whether or not they are capable of changing their lifelong management style.
If they canâ€™t, they could choose a strategy similar to one used by one of our clients. After reviewing several transition options, we reassessed the ownerâ€™s goals and determined they could be reached through an aggressive â€śvalue-depletionâ€ť strategy. Over the next few years, he will run his business with one primary objective: withdraw as much money from the practice as possible and transfer the funds to other (more passive) investments. Then, after reaching his financial goals, he will unload his business for whatever the market brings.
Mountain Lions: Grade D. Independent operators who fail to invest for the future end up paying themselves a high salary that cannot be sustained. Essentially, the business has become so dependent on the owner that buyers are unwilling to pay for what they believe is a risky investment. This can be disappointing for owners who are anxious to leave their business.
We saw this first hand after reviewing the operations of company in Idaho. The Type 1 owner told us that after working sixty hours a week for fifteen years, he was feeling burnt out. During our initial assessment (to determine the street value of the business among other things), we found that the company did not have any key managers, had no marketing plan or sales people, received over eighty-percent of its business from one customer, lacked effective processes and systems, and relied on equipment that would soon need to be replaced.
During our frank review we discussed these (and other) challenges needing attention, recommended specific steps to recapture some the companyâ€™s lost value, and created a critical path showing how he and his wife could transition from the business.
In response, the owner reminded us of his high salary. He wanted out, sooner rather than later. Against our advice, he listed his company with a business broker and ended up in a lawsuit when the broker sued him for commissionsâ€”even though the company never sold.
Four Types, One Outcome
In time, all owners will leave their company. A large number will do so by attempting to sell their business or practice to a third party in the hope of transferring the value of their business and investing it in other places. By understanding their preferred way to build and grow a business, as well as the impact made on its value, owners should be ableâ€”with enough time and courageâ€”to design an effective plan that will support his or her post-business life.
Paul Brown runs Brown Advisors, which helps start, build, grow, expand, and operate businesses through each of its transitions and challenges. Reach him at 509-926-6922 or as firstname.lastname@example.org