Beyond the Query
A Meandering in the Mind(s) of ChatGPT (Part II of III)
This is the second article of a three-part series. In the first article, the author introduced a brief history of her own word processing software use and preferences then used several models within an AI Tool, ChatGPT, to generate an article with a single prompt, “The article must be between 4750 and 5250 words, not including subtitles. The article must …
What You Missed in Part I
I introduced a brief history of my own word processing software use and preferences then used several models within an AI tool, ChatGPT, to generate an article with a single prompt, “The article must be between 4750 and 5250 words, not including subtitles. The article must include at least seven cited sources from peer-reviewed journals only. The article must be formatted in the five-paragraph essay format. The article must be a comparison of word processing software between 1998 and 2004.” There are some issues with this prompt. For instance, am I instructing the tool to avoid the use of subtitles or am I instructing the tool to exclude subtitles from the word count? Who knows? The tool ignored the word count for all eight attempts and included subtitles in each article.
What is Going on Now
In this, Part II of the series, I explore two more attempts to generate an article, each using a style of well-known authors, John Locke and Alfred Hitchcock. I did not instruct the tool any further regarding style other than listing the writer’s names.
Morals, Ethics, and Copyright (Oh My)
The AI tool did not need explicit information about John Locke or Alfred Hitchcock and did not need explicit instructions on where to find information about their writing styles. It also did not need explicit instructions on what a five-paragraph essay format is; although, Version 4 did a better job of meeting that requirement. I wonder if that speaks to just how many students used that instruction between Version 3 and Version 4. The AI tool did not misinterpret my wordy instructions and included subtitle headings in each article.
When regenerating the article in Version 3.5, a completely different set of sources was generated for the same facts (see Part I of this article series). Each of these attempts can be refined over time and I can create a chat model that only speaks back to me in the style of John Locke. Refining the responses over time is what is known as “training the model” and is discussed in more detail in Part III of this series. Given the even shorter word count on the Hitchcock attempt, I can only conclude that the AI tool has feelings, did not like being called lazy, and is now acting out. This conclusion is supported by the fact that when I instructed it to make the article 10 paragraphs, the AI tool did indeed generate an article with 10 paragraphs; however, each of those paragraphs was shorter than in the original article.
When choosing to copy another author’s style, you must carefully consider how much of that style is part of their ability to earn, how litigious is the base you are copying, and how much money do you have for your own defense.[1] Perhaps the use of John Locke and Alfred Hitchcock writing styles did not raise eyebrows in the ethics area of your brain—what about generating music “in the style of the Rolling Stones” or an outfit “in the style of Balenciaga” or artwork “in the style of Andy Warhol”?[2] These are questions that do not have clear answers and a clear answer is unlikely to ever emerge. Consider the art created by Andy Warhol, that consisted of the work of others, some of which he did not have permission to use in the way he did. He did not answer for his misuse of others’ work; his foundation did, but only many years later after litigation.[3]
The AI tool I used was not directly trained using works of John Locke or Alfred Hitchcock (i.e., I did not upload anything to the tool written by anyone and I did not point it to any websites where it could determine the styles of these two individuals), unlike Warhol’s use of a photograph created by someone else. The AI tool used information it already had at its disposal, which OpenAI claims is not protected while others claim OpenAI does not have permission to use the data it used.[4] Whose burden is it to ensure that the data used to train an AI model was gathered with the appropriate consent of the data originator—the producer of the AI tool, the trainer of the AI tool, the end-user of the AI tool, the AI itself, the data gatherer? This is yet another question that will have widely varying answers as AI and litigation continue.
Attempts 3 and 4: In the Style of John Locke
3rd and 4th Article Attempts (4th Shown), Version 3.5, Word Count: 805 and 805
Title: An Exposition on the Metamorphosis of Word Processing Software: A Comparative Discourse from 1998 to 2004
Introduction
In the annals of technological history, the epoch spanning from the late 20th century to the early years of the 21st witnessed a profound metamorphosis in the realm of word processing software. It is within this milieu that we embark upon a comparative analysis, delineating the evolutionary trajectory of these digital tools from the year 1998 to 2004. Through this exploration, we seek to unravel the tapestry of innovation, discerning the salient features, the usability paradigms, and the consequential impact of these software marvels upon the art of textual composition and document management.
Body Paragraph 1: Features and Interface
As the penultimate decade of the 20th century drew to a close, word-processing software, exemplified by the venerable Microsoft Word 97, proffered a modest repertoire of functionalities. Basic amenities such as word count, spell check, and rudimentary formatting options adorned its interface, which, by modern standards, appeared rudimentary. However, with the advent of the early 2000s and the unveiling of Microsoft Word 2003 alongside competitors like Corel WordPerfect, a veritable renaissance ensued. Novel features, including the revolutionary track changes mechanism, sophisticated formatting tools, and the advent of collaborative prowess, heralded a new era of textual refinement. The interface itself underwent a metamorphosis, shedding its erstwhile austerity for a more intuitive design, replete with task panes and customizable toolbars, thereby beckoning users into a realm of unprecedented usability and efficacy.
Body Paragraph 2: Compatibility and File Formats
In the crucible of technological innovation, interoperability emerged as a sine qua non for the denizens of the digital age. In the twilight years of the 20th century, the specter of compatibility loomed large, as proprietary formats held sway over the software landscape. Yet, by the dawn of the new millennium, a wind of change swept through the corridors of innovation. Efforts to standardize file formats, epitomized by the advent of XML-based standards such as OpenDocument Format (ODF) and Microsoft’s Office Open XML (OOXML), bore fruition. Thus, the erstwhile quagmire of compatibility gave way to a realm of seamless interchangeability, fostering an ecosystem wherein documents traversed platforms with unparalleled fluidity, to the delight of users and the advancement of technological progress.
Body Paragraph 3: Accessibility and Integration
In the quest for inclusivity, the evolution of word processing software bore witness to a commendable augmentation in accessibility features. Microsoft Word, in particular, emerged as a vanguard of inclusivity, with the introduction of pioneering tools such as speech recognition and text-to-speech capabilities. These strides towards universal access were complemented by a burgeoning integration with ancillary software applications. Email clients, web browsers, and project management tools found symbiosis within the hallowed precincts of word processors, engendering a harmonious confluence of disparate technologies. Thus, the nexus between accessibility and integration heralded a new dawn of productivity, wherein the erstwhile barriers of disability and technological silos were cast asunder.
Body Paragraph 4: Evolution of Collaboration Tools
The crucible of collaboration underwent a paradigmatic shift amidst the ebullient ferment of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Traditional word processors, tethered to the shackles of solitary endeavor, yielded ground to a burgeoning pantheon of cloud-based solutions. Google Docs, Microsoft Office 365, and their ilk emerged as harbingers of a new epoch, wherein collaborative editing transpired in real-time, unfettered by the constraints of temporal or spatial disparity. The hitherto arduous chore of version control metamorphosed into a seamless ballet of synchronous interaction, thereby transforming the very fabric of teamwork and textual refinement.
Body Paragraph 5: Impact on Productivity and Workflow
The seismic shifts engendered by the evolution of word processing software reverberated throughout the corridors of industry and academia, bestowing upon denizens of the digital realm a bounty of productivity and efficacy. The arsenal of advanced features, coupled with the panoply of collaborative tools, engendered a Renaissance in productivity, wherein the erstwhile vicissitudes of document creation were supplanted by a seamless tapestry of efficiency. From the hallowed halls of enterprise to the verdant pastures of academia, the transformative impact of these digital marvels manifested as an oasis of creativity and innovation, nurturing the aspirations of generations yet unborn.
Conclusion
In the crucible of technological innovation, the years spanning from 1998 to 2004 witnessed a veritable symphony of transformation in the realm of word processing software. The salient features, the intuitive interfaces, and the collaborative panache of these digital marvels heralded a new era in textual refinement and document management. As we cast our gaze towards the horizon of tomorrow, let us heed the lessons of yesteryear, embracing the spirit of innovation and collaboration that animated the epoch of yore. For it is in this crucible of creativity that the seeds of progress are sown, yielding a bountiful harvest of knowledge and enlightenment for posterity to cherish and behold.
Attempts 5 and 6: In the Style of Alfred Hitchcock
5th and 6th Article Attempts (6th Shown), Version 3.5, Word Count: 664 and 1,041
Title: The Enigma of Word Processing Software: An Intriguing Comparison from 1998 to 2004
Introduction
Imagine, if you will, a world where every keystroke holds the potential for mystery and intrigue. Welcome to the enigmatic realm of word processing software. As we embark on this journey through the corridors of digital creativity, prepare yourself for a tale of suspense and uncertainty. From the shadowy depths of 1998 to the dawn of 2004, the landscape of word processing underwent a transformation worthy of the silver screen. Join me, dear reader, as we unravel the mysteries, unveil the secrets, and confront the unseen forces that shaped this thrilling saga.
Body Paragraph 1: Features Unveiled
Our story begins in the year 1998, where Microsoft Word 97 reigns supreme, its interface shrouded in simplicity. Yet beneath this facade of familiarity lies a world of untold potential. Basic features such as word count and spell check serve as mere breadcrumbs in a labyrinth of possibility. But as the millennium draws near, a new protagonist emerges – Microsoft Word 2003. With it comes a cascade of innovation: track changes, advanced formatting tools, and a user interface teeming with hidden depths. The stage is set for a showdown of epic proportions, where every click of the mouse holds the key to unlocking a world of narrative intrigue.
Body Paragraph 2: Compatibility Unmasked
In the murky waters of technological evolution, compatibility emerges as a central theme in our tale. In 1998, proprietary file formats cast a shadow of uncertainty over the digital landscape, their opaque nature obscuring the path forward. But fear not, for our intrepid heroes – OpenDocument Format (ODF) and Microsoft’s Office Open XML (OOXML) – arrive to dispel the darkness. Their standardized file formats offer a glimmer of hope in a sea of confusion, paving the way for seamless interchangeability and untold adventures in document interoperability.
Body Paragraph 3: Accessibility Awakened
As our narrative unfolds, the theme of accessibility takes center stage. Microsoft Word emerges once more as a beacon of inclusivity, its arsenal of tools – speech recognition, text-to-speech capabilities – offering a lifeline to those navigating the treacherous waters of disability. But the plot thickens as integration becomes the linchpin of our story. Email clients, web browsers, and project management tools converge within the hallowed halls of word processors, blurring the lines between fiction and reality. As the barriers of accessibility crumble, a new era of productivity dawns, where every user – regardless of ability – is empowered to embark on their own digital odyssey.
Body Paragraph 4: Evolution of Collaboration Tools
Enter the realm of collaboration, where the plot takes an unexpected turn. Traditional word processors fade into obscurity, overshadowed by a new breed of cloud-based solutions. Google Docs, Microsoft Office 365 – names whispered in hushed tones, like characters in a Hitchcockian thriller. Real-time editing, version control – the stakes are high as teams navigate the treacherous waters of digital collaboration. As the lines between protagonist and antagonist blur, a new narrative emerges, where the quest for productivity becomes a battle for survival.
Body Paragraph 5: Impact on Productivity and Workflow
And so, we arrive at the climax of our tale – the impact of word processing software on productivity and workflow. From the shadows of uncertainty emerges a tale of triumph and transformation. Advanced features, collaborative tools – they become the heroes of our story, guiding users through the twists and turns of digital creation. From the halls of enterprise to the corridors of academia, the legacy of these digital marvels echoes through the ages. For in the end, it is not the software itself that captivates us, but the stories we create within its digital embrace.
Body Paragraph 6: Struggles and Challenges
But let us not forget the trials and tribulations faced on this journey. The road to innovation is fraught with peril, with obstacles lurking around every corner. Compatibility issues, accessibility challenges, and the ever-present specter of obsolescence cast a shadow over our protagonists. Yet it is in overcoming these challenges that true heroism is revealed. Like a phoenix rising from the ashes, our intrepid users forge ahead, undeterred by the pitfalls of technological uncertainty.
Body Paragraph 7: A Symphony of Innovation
Amidst the chaos and uncertainty, a symphony of innovation emerges. From the minds of visionary developers springs forth a tapestry of creativity and ingenuity. New features, improved interfaces, and seamless integration become the building blocks of a new digital frontier. With each new iteration, word processing software evolves, adapting to the changing needs of its users. It is a testament to the indomitable spirit of human endeavor, a triumph of innovation over adversity.
Body Paragraph 8: The Human Element
But amidst the whirlwind of technological advancement, let us not forget the human element at the heart of our story. For it is the users – the writers, the editors, the collaborators – who breathe life into the digital canvas. Their creativity, their passion, their tireless dedication shape the narrative of our tale. As we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of word processing software, let us remember the faces behind the screen, the unsung heroes whose stories enrich our own.
Body Paragraph 9: Lessons Learned
As our journey draws to a close, let us pause to reflect on the lessons learned. In a world of uncertainty, innovation becomes our guiding light, leading us through the darkness towards a brighter tomorrow. But let us also remember the importance of inclusivity, accessibility, and collaboration. For it is in embracing these principles that we pave the way for a more equitable and enlightened future.
Conclusion
In the end, our tale of word processing software is more than just a story; it is a testament to the resilience of the human spirit, a celebration of ingenuity and creativity. From the shadowy depths of uncertainty to the triumphant heights of innovation, our journey has been a thrilling odyssey through the digital frontier. As we bid farewell to the enigmatic world of word processing, let us carry forth the lessons learned, the stories shared, and the bonds forged along the way. For in the end, it is not the software itself that captivates us, but the human drama that unfolds within its digital embrace.
[1] These are a few among many considerations.
[2] https://www.npr.org/2019/05/23/726227555/not-bitter-just-sweet-the-rolling-stones-give-royalties-to-the-verve and https://www.vox.com/2018/4/27/17281022/fashion-brands-knockoffs-copyright-stolen-designs-old-navy-zara-h-and-m
[3] https://www.npr.org/2023/05/18/1176881182/supreme-court-sides-against-andy-warhol-foundation-in-copyright-infringement-cas
[4] https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/2024/07/08/openai-punches-upward-in-bigtime-legal-copyright-lawsuit-that-will-surely-determine-the-future-longevity-of-generative-ai/
Dorothy Haraminac, MBA, MAFF, CFE, PI, provides financial forensics, digital forensics, and blockchain forensics under YBR Consulting Services, LLC, and teaches software engineering and digital forensics at Houston Christian University. Ms. Haraminac is one of the first court-qualified testifying experts on cryptocurrency tracing in the United States and provides pro bono assistance to victims of cryptocurrency investment scams to gather and summarize evidence needed to report to law enforcement, regulators, and other parties. If you or someone you know has been victimized in an investment scam, report it to local, state, and federal law enforcement as well as federal agencies such as the FTC, the FCC, and the IRS.
Ms. Haraminac can be contacted at (346) 400-6554 or by e-mail to admin@ybr.solutions.
