• QuickPress

    Why Aren’t Clients Using QCDs? Help Them!

    Qualified charitable distributions can offer a tax-saving opportunity, and they may be more advantageous to consider under the new tax law.  QCDs, which are available only for certain clients, count toward required minimum distributions and are excluded from income. To read the full article in InvestmentNews, click: Why Aren’t Clients Using QCDs?  Help Them!

  • QuickPress

    Charitable IRA Distributions: A Great Opportunity

    The Many Tax Benefits of Making Charitable Contributions With IRA Distributions Now that the provision permitting these contributions is permanent, taxpayers can take maximum advantage of this rule, even using life insurance to increase the gift to charity.  David K. Smucker, CPA, Advanced Consulting Group director with Nationwide Insurance, explains that the recent legislation making the $100,000 charitable IRA contribution permanent allows taxpayers to take full advantage of the numerous tax benefits of these contributions. To read the full article in The Tax Adviser Tax Insider, click: Charitable IRA Distributions: A Great Opportunity.

  • Case Law - QuickRead Top Story

    Federal Cases: ESOP Fidiciuary Responsibility, Valuation Misstatement Penalties, More

    Plus: Bishop v. Commissioner Rules on When and Whether a Bad Debt Loss Can Be a Claimed Deduction In Schwab v. Commissioner, a case turns on when a variable universal life insurance policy is a taxable event.  In Boone Operations Co., LLC v. Commissioner, find out when contributing fill dirt to the city of Tucson is or isn’t a charitable or taxable event.

  • Case Law - QuickRead Featured

    Reasonably Certain Foreseeable Future Events and the Standard of Value

    In Berquist v. Commissioner, Judge Swift Finds a Company’s Pending Liquidation is Relevant and Foreseeable. The Tax Court valued closely-held stock in an anesthesiology practice donated to a hospital for charitable contribution purposes at its liquidation value since the anesthesiology practice would no longer exist after the physician-stockholders were consolidated into a newly-formed umbrella physician management company.  The donors valued the practice at $401.79 per share under the going concern premise of value.  The respondent determined a fair market value of $37.00 per share under the liquidation premise of value.  The Judge cited one key factor that determined his ruling. …