Whether to Establish an ESOP Not all companies are fit for an ESOP. The decision to create an ESOP is a significant one, and it requires careful evaluation beyond enthusiasm or the appeal of tax deferral. Two critical considerations stand out when evaluating whether to move forward: (1) independence of the valuation expert, and (2) whether the company is operationally, financially, and structurally suited for ESOP ownership. The author discusses the consequences of sponsoring an ESOP. For many closely held business owners, the question of succession planning often leads to consideration of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). ESOPs offer…
-
-
And the Trump Administration’s Freeze This article is the latest installment of QuickRead articles on ESOP regulations. Specifically, it focuses on the request, and status thereof, for the Department of Labor to clarify “adequate consideration” for the valuation of entities held in ESOPs. This article is the latest installment of QuickRead articles on ESOP regulations.[1] Specifically, it focuses on the request, and status thereof, for the Department of Labor (DOL) to clarify “adequate consideration” for the valuation of entities held in employee stock option plans (ESOP). On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order freezing all former President…
-
Part II For purposes of valuing an ESOP, the question of what is “adequate consideration” has vexed the author and other BV practitioners. In this article, the author shares an update on the DOL’s response to earlier inquiries. Her two previous articles published in QuickRead detailed the earlier efforts to clarify what constituted “adequate consideration” for the valuation of entities held in ESOPs. On October 25, 2024, the OMB received a proposal on the topic from the DOL intended to clarify how shares in ESOPs are valued via adequate consideration. To date, I have written two QuickRead articles (“Adequate Consideration”…
-
Federal Rules and Regulations Governing ESOPs Business valuation reports of employer’s securities owned by ESOPs are subject to review by plan fiduciaries, government agencies, and IQPAs auditing the ESOP’s financial statements. Each of these readers have their own responsibilities to the participants and beneficiaries of the plans. This article will examine the federal rules and regulations governing ESOPS, the responsibilities of the report readers, and the use of the report as audit evidence. Introduction Business valuation reports of employer’s securities owned by Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP) are subject to review by plan fiduciaries, government agencies, and independent qualified public…
-
A Legislative Approach? In April of 2023, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) committed to move forward with a regulation to clearly detail “adequate consideration” in section 408(e) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). For decades the DOL has utilized litigation versus heeding Congress’s edict to enact regulations regarding adequate consideration and it seems as though action is going to finally be taken. This article discusses recent developments suggesting a change in their approach. In April of 2023, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) committed to move forward with a regulation to clearly detail…
-
In the Formation of an ESOP Mr. Robert Reilly, in a two-part January 2020 QuickRead article, as published by NACVA, provides a detailed and learned discussion regarding the role a valuation analyst might play in the early stages of the formation of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). This paper is not intended to be, in any way, a critique of Mr. Reilly’s presentation, but rather an appendix highlighting some of the many risks a valuation analyst will face when accepting an ESOP related engagement. Mr. Robert Reilly, in a two-part January 2020 QuickRead article, as published by NACVA, provides…
-
The future of the fiduciary rule is up for grabs, again, and clients, advisers, and firms are jumping in to make their voices heard at a crucial moment. Via a public commentary board, the Department of Labor is hearing feedback on whether it should make changes to the fiduciary rule and delay the regulation’s second stage of implementation. Scroll through to see some of the most passionate and insightful comments filed thus far. To read the full article in FinancialPlanning, click: Fiduciary Rule Final Stand: ‘Please Rethink This’.
-
Analysis of Unaudited Financial Statements—Who and How? There has been much discussion within the ESOP community about the “settlement” and its reverberations. As readers are likely aware, the settlement in question refers to the 2014 settlement agreement between GreatBanc Trust Company and the United States Department of Labor (DOL). The terms of the settlement include, among other things, an agreement concerning fiduciary engagements and process requirements for employer stock transactions. The settlement provides pause for thought for all trustees and their advisors, as the agreement can be viewed as a “playbook” that, if followed, could serve as evidence that the…
-
Federal Agencies Plan Amendments to Form 5500 Employee benefit plans would face new reporting requirements under extensive changes to Form 5500, Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan, proposed by the federal government last month. The federal agencies are also proposing to require all group health plans to file Form 5500 along with a new Schedule J. Sally P. Schreiber, Tax Adviser senior editor, explains. To read the full article in The Tax Adviser, click: Agencies Propose Amendments to Employee Benefit Plan Reporting.
-
Worker Classification in the Gig Economy With one-third or more of Americans working as freelancers, the traditional factors for classifying workers as employees or independent contractors are becoming obsolete. Here’s what tax practitioners need to know about changing employment relationships in the gig economy. To read the full article in The Tax Adviser, click: Worker Classification and the Evolving Service Delivery Model.
-
What is the level of uncertainty behind why 401(k) plan sponsors don’t change default investment options? Hazel Bradford, reporter (Washington), visits this issue and addresses some concerns. To find out more on the Pensions & Investments’ article, click: GAO: 401(k) plan executives hesitant to change default options.